Two paths with a common goal: "Value for
Customer"
Let's take a step back about 15 years or so, we're
at the turn of the century, with no Facebook, no Twitter, and no Smartphones.
Desktop applications are the primary medium for users to interact with IT
solutions. In other news, the human genome sequence has just been released.
From a technological perspective, there were no auto-scaling,
automation-ready, audit-friendly AWS or Azure based solutions available.
Hardware is getting more affordable and Datacentres have become a mainstream
solution to support the increasing role of IT in business
operations. Organizations are starting to realize the importance of what's
inside the "black box" of IT. Discussions about
servers, storage, switches, routers, software licenses and such make little
sense to most, and supported by familiarity with the application service
provider (ASP) model, the peak of IT outsourcing has arrived. Enter the era of
service management.
Fast forward today, and you will be surprised if I tell you that neither
Microsoft, Facebook nor Google uses ITIL/ITSM anymore, but that doesn’t mean
rest of the world should stop using it. My recent gathering at Dublin, some
were very blunt “Do we really need a release calendar to follow?” When we have
virtualization on server level and on far more granularity like containers as
process level virtualization, when we have Github for continuous code control
and Jenkins for continuous integration and testing? We can isolate &
prepare environments to test our developed code output in minutes rather than
days without much risk on production platforms and still able to revert back to
few hour passed configurations with few clicks.
Question came to my mind, ITIL/ITSM
gives better control in the hands of Change Managers, others would say it gives
better tracking to avoid incidents for Service Managers, but in reality its
costing business a lot by taking away “Agility.” ITSM/ITIL was perfect
when Software
Defined Data Centres as well as Cloud Environments weren’t
matured enough as of today.
In today’s industry, we often hear such varying opinions around DevOps
and ITIL. These concepts are typically pitched against each other, as an
“either or decision.” Either we are an ITIL or a DevOps company
but it’s rare to host both. Let’s be clear: ITIL is important. Around two
million people have been trained in it, and as the closest thing to an industry
standard for IT management that currently exists, it has global reach.
ITSM quickly became the common language for
outsourcing companies and business leaders to identify and achieve their shared
goals. Within this movement, the ITIL framework—which had up to that point been
primarily used for IT operations management—became the de facto guidance for
achieving IT and business alignment. ITIL/ITSM delivered a more holistic
framework, with greater focus on previously overlooked aspects of service
management. The concept of the "service life-cycle" was
introduced to explain how various processes are interlinked and could be
aligned for the successful delivery of services. Addressing the customer
experience is another key component of ensuring value delivery. It's not enough
to cover only fitness-for-purpose; fitness-for-use is an equally important
concept. A solution that delivers on every point in terms of functionality but
is a pain to use, isn't an example of a service that delivers value as it
should.
DevOps is neither a framework nor a methodology. Its adopting best
available tools in market for continuous delivery in a most control manner.
Before someone consider introducing DevOps, they have to ensure they do
internal organizational analysis on three below aspects:
·
· Organizational
Delivery Culture
·
· Empowering
Tools
·
· Well
trained manpower
Always be on the lookout for opportunities to
improve your services and your service management capabilities, and to increase
the value you deliver. For example, the technological advancements of the past
years have made it possible, and often desirable to leverage automation
capabilities in order to spend time on more valuable activities.
While many organizations are afraid of increased risk of failure and
decreased levels of auditability with automation, the truth is that automation
can decrease risk and increase auditability significantly. While the success of
many services relates to the mean time between failures (MTBF), increased
attention to system and service resilience has led to mean time to repair
(MTTR) gaining in importance. Before deciding where to focus, assess what your
organization needs, and what it's ready for.
Let me be clear: ITIL is no silver bullet. It can't be the exclusive
answer to every IT challenge you have. It provides you with a structure alongside a common language between Business and Technology. It helps you see the bigger picture of
the inter-dependencies and improvement opportunities within your
system.
As a framework, rather than a methodology. ITIL expects you to combine its guidance
with other techniques to ensure you deliver
what's required: value to your customers.


Comments
Post a Comment